|

Presented
at the Annual Conference of the Austrian Society for Physical Medicine
and Rehabilitation
"Using
Magnetic Fields to Increase Flexibility and Reduce Pain with Respect
to Ailments of the Ambulatory Apparatus."
Author:
Dr. Joze Barovic
Co-Authors: Dr. G. Fischer, Dr. Z. Turk, Dr. W. Kobinger
Study conducted at Marburg Teaching Hospital, Drau (Slovakia) and
the Institute of Hygiene, Graz University (Austria), 1995
Between
01/02/95 and 01/09/95, 23 female and 23 male patients suffering
from ailments of their ambulatory and sustentacular apparatus, were
treated with a new magnetic field device, QRS, in two research phases.
The patients had not been surgically treated for their ailments.
The
patients (Ave age: 51.0 +/- 1 15.la) were suffering from intervertebral
disc prolapse (n=25, diagnosed via myclography), spinal stenosis
(n=18, diagnosed on basis of CT), and osteoporosis (n=-2, diagnosis
using densiometry). There was also one patient with spinal stenosis
and osteoporosis (See 3. Paragraph 1).
The
subjects were treated in 20 sessions (8 minutes twice daily - once
in the morning and once in the afternoon) over a two-week period
(Mon-Fri) on a mattress-like application mat (3 pairs of reels for
neck, trunk and legs) using the maximum field-level setting on the
device (Bmax = 4 mt).
Success
of the therapy was evaluated using a 10-point Dole scale and (only
in the first phase of the experimental tests n = 28) comparing a
measurement of the distance between the finger tips and the floor
while the patients were bending forward - both prior to, and following,
treatment. Evaluation of the subjective pain experienced by the
subjects was carried out using the preliminary non-parametric maximum,
sequential range, and semi-qualitative Chi2 tests. Due to organizational
reasons, flexibility was only measured in the first experimental
phase and was evaluated by using the two-tailed V-Test for unequal
variances (parametric test).
The
results of the individual pain assessments accrued, using the 3
(non) parametric tests, showed the following results with respect
to the overall group (3 paragraph 2):
Using
the sequential range test there was already a significant result
after 8 of the 46 Improvements (p<0.05). The exact level of error
could not be determined due to methodological reasons. The maximum
test showed a highly significant reduction in pain (p<0.00l) after
computing only the 11 largest Dole scale differences.
As
before, it was not possible to determine the exact probability of
error. Proceeding on the null hypothesis of an equal distribution
of improvement / worsening of the perception of pain following.
The
application of the magnetic field treatment the results of the Chi2
test (p<0.001) were highly significant in favor of the positive
effect of the magnetic field treatment.
Although
only measured in 28 patients, due to organizational reasons, the
increased flexibility in bending forward was also highly significant
(p<0.0001) (see 3 paragraph 2).
The
results presented in both categories reflect those indicated in
international literature.
Further
cases are currently being statistically substantiated.
Publication
Article
Medizinisch-Orthopadische
Technik (Medical- Orthopedic Techniques)
"Conservative Treatment of 240 Patients with Magnetic Field Therapy"
March/April 1976, Issue 2, page 78
By M. Schroter
Summary:
Magnetic
field therapy (MFT) is a clear therapeutic gain in conservatively
oriented therapeutics. By no means does it constitute an alternative
solution to other forms of therapy, but it has become an established
component in the entire treatment spectrum of orthopedics. The indications
and results are presented briefly.
The
following data relate to a group of 240 patients treated with magnetic
field therapy in a conservative orthopedic practice. Any secondary
treatment by medication was dropped in 90% of the cases treated
with MFT in order not to obscure the therapeutic success, if any.
However, in two of Morbus Bechterew's cases, aged 24 and 27, Indometacin
was applied. After about 50 sessions of MFT, we discontinued the
medication, following gradual reduction, over time, of the daily
dose.
Back
to Top
|